
|
Cytogenetics |
|
|
|
Written by Nigel Carter
|
|
Nov 03, 2004 at 10:31 AM |
Cytogenetics
Image and Flow Cytometry are key technologies in modern Molecular Cytogenetics. ISAC provides an international forum for discussion and publication of technical developments and new applications in this field.
| Multi-colour digital fluorescence microscopy and image analysis is used extensively for the analysis of cytogenetic rearrangements using molecular probes such as cloned DNA fragments and chromosome paints. Using combinatorial labelling of chromosome paints with five fluorochromes, all of the 24 different human chromosome types can be painted in a different colour. |
 |
|
 |
Flow cytometry and in particular flow sorting is used to separate
individual chromosome types into purified frations. These are
then used for making chromosome libraries and chromosome paints.
Sorting of aberrant chromosomes is also useful for the molecular
characterisation of chromosome breaks causing human disease. |
Nigel Carter - 25 October 2000
Links:
Reviews:
Carter NP. Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting. Cytometry. 1994 Mar 15;18(1):2-10. Review. PMID: 8082483; UI: 94364109
References
1: Kubalakova M, Lysak MA, Vrana J, Simkova H, Cihalikova J, Dolezel J.
Rapid identification and determination of purity of flow-sorted plant
chromosomes using C-PRINS. Cytometry. 2000 Oct 1;41(2):102-8. [MEDLINE
record in process] PMID: 11002265; UI: 20458959
2: Satoh T, Yamamoto K, Miura KF,
Sasaki K, Ishidate M Jr. Application of laser scanning cytometry to the
analysis of chromosomal aberrations induced by benzo[a]pyrene in
CHO-WBLT cells. Cytometry. 1999 Apr 1;35(4):363-8. PMID: 10213202; UI:
99228190
3: Muller S, O'Brien PC,
Ferguson-Smith MA, Wienberg J. Cross-species colour segmenting: a novel
tool in human karyotype analysis. Cytometry. 1998 Dec 1;33(4):445-52.
PMID: 9845439; UI: 99059572
4: Ray FA, Waltman MJ, Lehman
JM, Little JB, Nickoloff JA, Kraemer PM. Identification of SV40
T-antigen mutants that alter T-antigen-induced chromosome damage in
human fibroblasts. Cytometry. 1998 Apr 1;31(4):242-50. PMID: 9551599;
UI: 98211321
5: Larramendy ML, El-Rifai W,
Knuutila S. Comparison of fluorescein isothiocyanate- and Texas
red-conjugated nucleotides for direct labeling in comparative genomic
hybridization. Cytometry. 1998 Mar 1;31(3):174-9. PMID: 9515716; UI:
98175467
6: Lucretti S, Dolezel J.
Bivariate flow karyotyping in broad bean (Vicia faba). Cytometry. 1997
Jul 1;28(3):236-42. PMID: 9222109; UI: 97365239
7: Moore DH 2nd, Pallavicini M,
Cher ML, Gray JW. A t-statistic for objective interpretation of
comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) profiles. Cytometry. 1997 Jul
1;28(3):183-90. PMID: 9222102; UI: 97365232
8: Tarkkanen M, Nordling S,
Bohling T, Kivioja A, Karaharju E Szymanska J, Elomaa I, Knuutila S.
Comparison of cytogenetics, interphase cytogenetics, and DNA flow
cytometry in bone tumors. Cytometry. 1996 Sep 15;26(3):185-91. PMID:
8889389; UI: 97044318
9: Veuskens J, Marie D, Brown SC,
Jacobs M, Negrutiu I. Flow sorting of the Y sex chromosome in the
dioecious plant Melandrium album. Cytometry. 1995 Dec 1;21(4):363-73.
PMID: 8608734; UI: 96189500
10: Emery CL, Cleveland RP.
B-cell prolymphocytic leukemia expressing discordant myeloid-associated
antigens in simultaneous specimens from bone marrow and peripheral
blood. Cytometry. 1995 Sep 15;22(3):243-9. PMID: 8556956; UI: 96106608
11: De Vita R, Cavallo D,
Eleuteri P, Dell'Omo G. Evaluation of interspecific DNA content
variations and sex identification in Falconiformes and Strigiformes by
flow cytometric analysis. Cytometry. 1994 Aug 1;16(4):346-50. PMID:
7527316; UI: 95079912
12: Rens W, Van Oven CH, Stap J,
Jakobs ME, Aten JA. Slit-scanning technique using standard cell sorter
instruments for analyzing and sorting nonacrocentric human chromosomes,
including small ones. Cytometry. 1994 May 1;16(1):80-7. PMID: 8033738;
UI: 94307090
13: Manogaran PS, Pande G.
Identification of a marker chromosome in a rat ascitic tumor by flow
cytometry using a modified method for preparing chromosome suspensions.
Cytometry. 1993;14(3):349-53. PMID: 8472613; UI: 93231020
14: Telenius H, de Vos D, Blennow
E, Willat LR, Ponder BA, Carter NP. Chromatid contamination can impair
the purity of flow-sorted metaphase chromosomes. Cytometry.
1993;14(1):97-101. PMID: 8432210; UI: 93161881
15: Bouvet A, Konfortov BA,
Miller NG, Brown D, Tucker EM. Identification of pig chromosomes in
pig-mouse somatic cell hybrid bivariate flow karyotypes. Cytometry.
1993;14(4):369-76. PMID: 7685678; UI: 93292367
16: Boschman GA, Manders EM, Rens
W, Slater R, Aten JA. Semi-automated detection of aberrant chromosomes
in bivariate flow karyotypes. Cytometry. 1992;13(5):469-77. PMID:
1633726; UI: 92339282
17: Schmitz A, Chaput B, Fouchet
P, Guilly MN, Frelat G, Vaiman M. Swine chromosomal DNA quantification
by bivariate flow karyotyping and karyotype interpretation. Cytometry.
1992;13(7):703-10. PMID: 1451601; UI: 93083334
18: Seeger S, Monajembashi S,
Hutter KJ, Futterman G, Wolfrum J, Greulich KO. Application of laser
optical tweezers in immunology and molecular genetics. Cytometry.
1991;12(6):497-504. PMID: 1684929; UI: 92111327
19: van Vliet LJ, Young IT,
Mayall BH. The Athena semi-automated karyotyping system. Cytometry.
1990;11(1):51-8. PMID: 2307062; UI: 90168534
20: Martin AO, Isenstein BS,
Thomas CW, Rzeszotarski MS, Johnson WE. Stylized chromosome images.
Cytometry. 1990;11(1):40-50. PMID: 2307061; UI: 90168533
21: Arndt-Jovin DJ, Jovin TM.
Multivariate chromosome analysis and complete karyotyping using dual
labeling and fluorescence digital imaging microscopy. Cytometry.
1990;11(1):80-93. PMID: 2106421; UI: 90168538
22: Carter NP, Ferguson-Smith ME,
Affara NA, Briggs H, Ferguson-Smith MA. Study of X chromosome
abnormality in XX males using bivariate flow karyotype analysis and
flow sorted dot blots. Cytometry. 1990;11(1):202-7. PMID: 2106420; UI:
90168530
23: Trask B, van den Engh G,
Nussbaum R, Schwartz C, Gray J. Quantification of the DNA content of
structurally abnormal X chromosomes and X chromosome aneuploidy using
high resolution bivariate flow karyotyping. Cytometry.
1990;11(1):184-95. PMID: 2106419; UI: 90168528
24: van den Engh G, Hanson D,
Trask B. A computer program for analyzing bivariate flow karyotypes.
Cytometry. 1990;11(1):173-83. PMID: 2106418; UI: 90168527
25: Bartholdi MF, Meyne J,
Johnston RG, Cram LS. Chromosome banding analysis by slit-scan flow
cytometry. Cytometry. 1989 Mar;10(2):124-33. PMID: 2496955; UI:
89231245
26: Dean PN, Kolla S, Van Dilla
MA. Analysis of bivariate flow karyotypes. Cytometry. 1989
Mar;10(2):109-23. PMID: 2469555; UI: 89231244
27: van den Engh G, Trask B,
Lansdorp P, Gray J. Improved resolution of flow cytometric measurements
of Hoechst- and chromomycin-A3-stained human chromosomes after addition
of citrate and sulfite. Cytometry. 1988 May;9(3):266-70. PMID: 2454178;
UI: 88242327
28: Conia J, Bergounioux C,
Perennes C, Muller P, Brown S, Gadal P. Flow cytometric analysis and
sorting of plant chromosomes from Petunia hybrida protoplasts.
Cytometry. 1987 Sep;8(5):500-8. PMID: 3665674; UI: 88028913
29: Harris P, Morton CC,
Guglielmi P, Li F, Kelly K, Latt SA. Mapping by chromosome sorting of
several gene probes, including c-myc, to the derivative chromosomes of
a 3;8 translocation associated with familial renal cancer. Cytometry.
1986 Nov;7(6):589-94. PMID: 3536362; UI: 87053116
30: Arkesteijn GJ, van
Dierendonck JH, Vossepoel AM, Cornelisse CJ. Flow karyotyping of human
melanoma cell lines. Cytometry. 1986 Sep;7(5):425-30. PMID: 3757691;
UI: 87003911
31: Collard JG, de Boer PA,
Janssen JW, Schijven JF, de Jong B. Gene mapping by chromosome spot
hybridization. Cytometry. 1985 May;6(3):179-85. PMID: 3996134; UI:
85203266
32: Mayall BH, Carrano AV,
Moore DH 2d, Ashworth LK, Bennett DE, Mendelsohn ML. The DNA-based
human karyotype. Cytometry. 1984 Jul;5(4):376-85. PMID: 6205836; UI:
84284823
33: Bijman JT. Optimization of
mammalian chromosome suspension preparations employed in a flow
cytometric analysis. Cytometry. 1983 Mar;3(5):354-8. PMID: 6839885; UI:
83181904
34: Cremer C, Cremer T, Gray JW.
Induction of chromosome damage by ultraviolet light and caffeine:
correlation of cytogenetic evaluation and flow karyotype. Cytometry.
1982 Mar;2(5):287-90. PMID: 7075394; UI: 82186073 |
|
Last Updated ( Jul 11, 2005 at 03:29 PM )
|
|